Posts Tagged tax day tea party

Interview with Dr. John Lewis

Dr. John Lewis, who gave the stirring speech at the Charlotte Tea Party on April 15th (video; text) granted us an interview to discuss the impact of his speech, his new book, the future of the country, and other topics. Read on for some great responses.

  • How positive was the response to your Charlotte Tea Party speech? Has it opened any unexpected doors for you?

The response was overwhelmingly positive. The big question of such an event is whether it will be dominated by anarchists (who see no need for a government to protect individual rights), or the religious right (who base their claims on divine visions). I saw little of either. People were there because they are outraged about the crisis in government today–a government that is unwilling to control spending, and that sees no limits to its power to coerce Americans. They were as outraged about government grants to millionaires as they were about welfare programs for the poor.

The door that has opened is to offer intellectual guidance for those who are outraged. Outrage is an emotion. If not based on an intellectual understanding of the issues, it will either dissipate into powerlessness, or mutate into fringe political groups that are as dangerous to American freedom as are the two political parties today. Most of all, this is an opportunity for those Republicans who want limited government to take their party back from the conservatives, who want to impose their own moral views by force onto the rest of us.

  • Do you fear some in the audience latched on to your use of the word “moral”, assumed you meant Christianity, and ignored the rest of your explanation of rational self-interest?

Well, they will have to twist their understand of individual rights–which are inalienable to us by nature–into the gift of a deity or his representatives. I hope that I presented a view of “moral” that is something other than such a gift. The New Testament calls for socialism–see Acts 4.31 through 5.11–and bases it on fear. One Ananias died after failing to hand over all of his wealth to the Apostles–and his wife then died for covering for him. It’s high time for Christians to admit that “give unto the poor” (Jesus) and “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” (Marx) mean the same thing, once enacted politically or inculcated morally.

But my speech was short–it cannot substitute for a broader philosophical understanding of ourselves, the world around us, and the nation we live in. Those who understand the nature of rights, should realize that a supernatural, faith-based understanding of rights concedes to the socialists their claim to be scientific and rational. This concession has prevented conservatives from defending capitalism for the past three generations. If not challenged, it will destroy freedom. But many conservatives, unwilling to grasp the nature of capitalism, freedom and rights, have become supporters of the welfare state. It is time to end this destructive alliance between the socialist left and the religious right.

I might suggest you see my article, “Reason or Faith: The Republican Alternative,” in The Objective Standard.

  • What advice can you give to other Objectivists wanting to make such a rousing speech?

Know your case, and know your principles. There is no shortcut to a good education as the prerequisite to defending reason, rights and freedom.

  • Can you provide some info about your new book, Nothing Less Than Victory? - what is it about, what motivated you to write it, when is it expected to be available, etc?

Nothing Less Than Victory: The Will to Fight and the Lessons of History is in production with Princeton University Press. The book maintains that wars begin because men choose to fight. Only ideas–specifically moral ideas–can lead men into years of slaughter on a continental scale. Major wars do not rage due to chance, technology, or even charismatic leadership–it is ideas that allow men to follow their leaders into carnage for aggressive purposes. For aggressors, the idea of sacrificing oneself for the aggrandizement of the state or the nation–through loot, enslavement of neighbors, or territorial expansion–fuels such a massive efforts at destruction. Many defenders may share those views, and in some wars neither side is right. But in wars in which the side being attacked is out to defend the lives of its citizens, an understanding of their moral goodness is necessary for an effective defense. This is what America had in 1941, when Japan attacked and Germany declared war.

Nothing Less Than Victory examines six wars, from the Greeks and the Romans into the American Civil War and World War Two–in which one side attacked, and the war bogged down into years of bloodshed, until the side under attack mounted a vigorous offense, and destroyed the will to fight in the other. The result, in these cases, was long-term peace, based on a new relationship between former enemies. My book asks us to reconsider the basis for wars in ideas, and to ask what was needed to confront, and end, the will to war in these cases.

[For related discussion in advance of Dr. Lewis's book, I recommend Dr. Yaron Brook's excellent lecture Democracy vs. Victory: Why the "Forward Strategy of Freedom" Had to Fail. --Brian]

  • You have written numerous articles about socialism, American Conservatism, and Islam. Which do you think is currently the greatest threat to our individual rights, and to the country?

The greatest threat is our own failure to understand the nature of our rights, and to recognize the moral goodness of a nation founded to protect those rights. Without this understanding, any one of the movements you mentioned could undercut and destroy the American Republic, and leave its citizens living under a dictatorship. Socialism is destroying America–but this has been abetted by “compassionate conservatism.” And, neither Republicans nor Democrats have been willing to confront and end the threat of totalitarian Islam.

It is clear today that the threats we face are not primarily military attack. It is the subversion of the American system of government that is the greatest threat–and this can only happen by the passive acquiescence of the majority of Americans, who would rise up and demand an end to these threats, if they understood them. This is the historic opportunity we have today–to ground our rights, and our government, on a proper moral basis. If we do that, and act openly in our own rational self-interest, we will save ourselves, our nation, and, incidentally, the world.


John David Lewis is a Visiting Professor of Political Science at Duke University. He has been a Senior Research Scholar in History and Classics at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, and an Anthem Fellow. He contributes to Capitalism Magazine, and is a Consulting Editor for The Objective Standard.

, , , , , , , , ,

3 Comments

The Charlotte Tea Party Speech

The following is reprinted with permission from Capitalism Magazine. Dr. Lewis has set the bar high for those intending to provide a moral defense of capitalism at public events. Also check out the video of his speech.

The Charlotte Tea Party Speech by Dr. John David Lewis, Dept. of Political Science, Duke University was first first delivered on April 15, 2009, Charlotte, North Carolina. This is a slightly revised version by Dr. Lewis for printed publication. Permission is given to read this in full, wherever defenders of liberty may gather.

It is high time for a tea party in America!

But to do this right, we need to understand what it means. So I want to think back for a moment to what happened over 200 years ago, at the time of the original Boston Tea Party.

The Founders of this nation brought forth a radical idea. It was truly radical, practiced nowhere before this time.

This idea was the Rights of Man. The Founders saw each of us as endowed with certain inalienable rights, rights that may not be separated from our nature as autonomous beings.

These inalienable rights are:

  • The Right to Life–the right to live your own life, to choose your own goals, and to preserve your own independent existence.
  • The Right to Liberty, which is the right to act to achieve your goals, without coercion by other men.
  • The Right to the Pursuit of Happiness, to act to achieve your own success, your own prosperity, and your own happiness, for your own sake.
  • And the Right to Property—the right to gain, keep, and enjoy, the material products of your efforts.

Unless I’m mistaken I don’t see anything here about a right to happiness. I see a right to the pursuit of happiness: the right to take the actions needed to attain one’s own happiness. Nor do I see any rights to things at all—no rights to food, clothing, healthcare or diapers. There is only a right to act to achieve those things. This is called freedom.

These rights to act—the rights to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit of happiness—are founded on a certain view of man. Each of us is an individual, autonomous, moral being, with the right to choose his own values and capable of directing his own life.

Look at the person next to you, and look in the mirror—do you see the individual sovereign human being, existing for his own sake, with the right to live, to love, and to act?

This idea—the Founders’ idea of the individual Rights of Man—led to a radical view of government. Government was not to be inherited by the force of an entrenched aristocracy as in Europe, imposed by the divine right of kings through generations of oppression, or enforced by the force of a club.

Government in America was to be designed and instituted by thinking men, for a single purpose: to protect and defend the Rights of Man.

This is what the American Declaration of Independence says: “To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men.” Thinking men, armed with the idea of rights, created a government limited to the protection of individual rights.

For centuries in Europe, the relationship between the people and the government had been that of serf to master: everyone was a servant of the ruling elite. In America, this was turned upside down: government became the servant of the individual. The very reason for a government–and its purpose–is to secure our inalienable, individual rights.

The results in America speak for themselves: the greatest most prosperous nation the world has ever seen. I here quote the writer Ayn Rand (and if you want to understand what is happening today, read her novel Atlas Shrugged). Ayn Rand, speaking to the graduating class at West Point, said that the United States was the first and only moral nation in the history of man, the first nation founded on a moral principle, the Rights of Man, and with a moral purpose, to secure these rights for all men.

This principle of rights is so strong that over years the Americans were able to correct the original shortcomings that the Founders’ could not overcome. Slavery and the denial of women’s suffrage both fell when the principle of rights was properly applied to all men. To correct the original errors did not require the Americans to overthrow the principle, but rather to strengthen and to deepen it, to apply it to everyone, and to renew their commitment to it.

And that is what we must do today.

Because something very bad has happened in America over the last century. A cancer has implanted itself in the land of the free. A cancer has grown in our government and in our society. The cancer is the idea that government is no longer to be the defender of our rights, but rather the grantor of wishes.

Over the past century the idea took hold that government’s purpose was not to secure our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but rather to satisfy our needs, whims and wants. That idea has been implanted in our schools, our media, and our government.

Do you wish for a better house? There’s a government housing agency to give it to you, with taxes extorted from those who buy their own house. Do you wish for health care? There is a government agency who will extort it from others and give it to you. Do you need food? There is a welfare agency to grab the wealth needed to give you food stamps.

And who will provide these handouts? The government, many people say, the all-powerful being that looms over us and grants our wishes. But who is to provide the goods that government hands out? Every person who works and produces, and whose property, gained by the sweat of his efforts, is taken from him by force.

The government has, once again, become a ruling aristocracy, set up as our masters, disposing of our lives.

This cancer has now grown to the point where this ruling elite controls a budget of over four thousand billion dollars a year—more money than can be conceived by the human mind. The government had to grow this big—and it will continue to grow until it destroys this nation—because it is acting according to the idea that it is morally right to take the wealth from those who produce it, and to give it to those who want it.

At the root of this idea is a view of man that is totally at odds with the vision of the Founders: the modern vision of man as a whining dependent, who begs for the needs of life from an all-powerful governing aristocracy. This ruling elite claims the moral right to distribute the wealth of those who earn it to those who wish for it.

If we are going to challenge this monstrosity, if we are going to expunge this cancer, then this is what we must reject. We need to regain the vision of ourselves held by the American Founders. We need to stand up, and assert ourselves as autonomous moral beings, with the right to our own life, liberty and the pursuit of our own happiness. We need to reject the claim that we are weak and dependent beggars, and to assert our own competence to run our own lives.

It is going to take as great a commitment to destroy this cancer as it took to build it. We’re going to have to be strong, we’re going to have to be independent in our thinking, and we are going to have to reject handouts when they are offered to us. And we’re going to have to speak out.

At its heart, the economic and political crisis is a deeper problem—a moral problem. The cause of the crisis today is the worship of need, and the view of man as too stupid to act for his own sake, and worthy of being milked of all his values, to provide for others. This is what we must reject.

Do you think that this is a conspiracy to seize your wealth? It is far worse than that. As Ayn Rand wrote, “It is not your wealth that they’re after. Theirs is a conspiracy against the mind, which means: against life and man.”

This is an attempt to seize your life, to destroy your sense of self as an independent human being, and to replace it with a being with no self-esteem and no capacity for individual action—a being doomed to beg for sustenance from an all-powerful ruling elite.

This ruling elite, looking down on us right now, cannot understand gatherings such as these, in which free people gather to defend liberty. They think that this must be orchestrated by a vast conspiracy, because they cannot understand how autonomous human beings might gather by their own choice, to affirm their commitment to liberty.

Our so-called leaders think this because they don’t see autonomous moral beings at all. They see only serfs, sniveling and whining, begging their masters for the scraps needed to survive, acting as a collective mob rather than as thinking individuals.

Look at yourselves again. Do you see in your face, and in the face of the person next to you, the slave of a group, with no moral status, no rights and no liberties, who is bound from birth to serve? Or do you see an autonomous being with the right to live for his own sake?

Will you knuckle under and become a helpless dependent? Or will you stand tall, and defend your right to your own life, your own liberty, your pursuit of your own individual happiness, and your own property?

It is time to stand up, to say no to the creed of dependence, to assert ourselves, to assert our own moral status, to defend our right to our own lives and property, and to make our voices heard.

Thank you very much.

John David Lewis

Dr. Lewis would like to give his thanks to Char Cushman for the transcription, Andy Clarkson for the original video, and to Matthew Ridenhour for arranging the Charlotte Tea Party.

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Janeane Garofalo to the Rescue!

For the black man with whom we talked at the Cleveland Tea Party for ten minutes, it must be upsetting to find out that he’s actually a “redneck” “racist” who’s mad that “there’s a black man in the White House.”

Sure, all he talked about was how he was starting a new business with a relative, and was sick of all the governmental hoops he had to jump through. He may have even seemed eager and happy to get a free copy of Atlas Shrugged. But this was obviously just self-deception.

Some day he will have to face his deeply-rooted emotional problems, if there is to be any hope of recovery. Luckily for him, Janeane Garofalo is here to force it out into the open. She also gives her expert opinion on what is physically occurring in his brain to evoke these psychological issues. Click below for a highly insightful discussion!

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

, , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Ohio Government Disregards Individual Responsibility When Convenient

I just received a message from the Ohio Attorney General about a piece posted on their site. They call it “Know Your Rights” - a more accurate title would be “Trash Your Rights”. The article lists supposed “rights” - enforced by the State of Ohio - that permit people within the comfort of their own homes to sign contracts without actually being bound by them:

Under Ohio’s Home Solicitation Sales Act, consumers have three days to cancel a contract they sign in their home or at a location other than the company’s regular place of business, such as a home improvement show or a hotel lobby.

The seller must give you a cancellation form at the time of the sale. To cancel the contract, you must cancel in writing by midnight of the third business day after the transaction. Business days are Mondays through Saturdays; Sundays and legal holidays are not.

So, rather than allow a person to take responsibility for his own actions and thoroughly investigate a contract before signing it, the state government takes the convenient route - simply permit contracts to be invalidated without threat of backlash! This they call a “right”. Unfortunately, such “rights” must necessarily violate actual individual rights - those rights on which the country was founded, and which are necessary for people to be free to live and pursue their values and goals - the rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness.

Do they really think this law will do anything positive? Certainly it’s not - otherwise they wouldn’t have to send out periodic reminders. Rather than cut down on the number of irresponsibly-signed contracts, it no doubt increases that number, and likewise the number of complaints from consumers. But regardless of whether or not such a law would work in practice, it does not justify the violation of individual rights that comes with such regulations. People must be free to set the terms of their contracts and expect the courts to back them up. As John Lewis pointed out in a speech at a recent tea party protest, such laws are an inversion of the master-servant relationship between the people and the government - “we the master, government the servant!”

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Tea Party Summary

[Welcome HBLers! Thanks to Anu Seppala at ARI for the submission.]

We at the Ohio Objectivist Society had a great time attending both the Canton and Cleveland tea parties. There were at least a thousand at the first, and at least twice that at the second. We brought about 60 copies of our booklet of reprinted essays, The Portable Objectivist, and 30 copies of Atlas Shrugged to hand out to interested individuals. I also made a few signs: “Ayn Rand Was Right” — “Atlas Will Shrug”; “Who is John Galt” — “Read Atlas Shrugged”; “Free the Market” — “$” [big green dollar sign].

First up was the Canton Tea Party. It had been raining all morning, but finally stopped when we arrived in Canton. It was still cold, and threatened rain all day. As soon as we got there, Matt, our executive director, started mingling in the crowd - he has a real knack for that. The rest of us walked around the perimeter, and it wasn’t long before we got a request from a local radio station - Ron Ponder’s show on WHBC 1480 AM - for a live interview. We rushed to get Matt, and he was live on the radio within minutes. He covered who we are, why we were there, what we stood for, how we were different from the rest, etc. Here is a photo of us holding up signs during the interview:

Matt went on mingling in the crowd, while we found a strategic high-traffic location, waiting for people to come to us. And they did! At least one in five people were drawn to the “Atlas Will Shrug”/”Ayn Rand Was Right” sign, and told us their stories about when they first read the book. Many were reading it now or had just finished it, but there were a few who read it over 40 or 50 years ago, and an even smaller minority who had read it several times, as well as the rest of Rand’s work. Several others took photos of our signs, or pointed and smiled.

The response to our signs was quite remarkable, and there were even multiple people who said, “nobody is going to get the reference.”

After the Canton event, we grabbed a bite to eat - steaks all ’round at the Longhorn Steakhouse, and mine was bacon-wrapped! We got to Cleveland early and took shelter at a local bar to talk about the Canton event and what to do differently for the Cleveland one. We decided that seeking people out was a better strategy, particularly because the crowd was expected to be larger.

At the Cleveland event, there were several other people with signs referencing Rand - several “Who is John Galt?”, some “Atlas Will Shrug”, and shirts with “John Galt 2012″ and “I am John Galt”. We made several laps around the crowd, and sought out such people to give them business cards and booklets, and let them know about our future meetups and other events. It was a real surprise to meet a self-professed Objectivist couple at the event; hopefully we’ll see them at a future meetup.

My favorite moment at the event was when a guy, who had brought his young son, said that he met his wife over Atlas Shrugged - they were both reading it at the same time. It was his favorite book, and he hoped his son could read it when he gets older. Thad immediately pulled out a copy from his bag, and the kid’s eyes lit up. We tried to limit our distribution to people who said they had heard about the book and wanted to read it. Everyone who got a copy was excited and couldn’t wait to read it.

In all, we handed out over 20 copies of Atlas Shrugged, over 40 copies of our booklet, and dozens of business cards. We got on a couple radio shows, one local TV news segment, and were interviewed by a small local newspaper, all to spread our name. And it’s working - the emails are already pouring in, with people interested in future meetups, book reviews, etc.

For Objectivists interested in attending future protests - such as the Independence Day Tea Party - the one thing we recommend is to bring a nice clear sign that mentions Atlas Shrugged and Ayn Rand. If you build it, they will come.

Courtesy Terri Dewell

Courtesy Terri Dewell

Here is a slideshow of photos taken by the OOS at the events:

, , , , , ,

10 Comments

Misrepresenting “How We Arrived At This Moment”

Alex Epstein over at the Ayn Rand Center has just released an excellent op-ed on the current financial crisis.

What must be done to recover from this financial crisis? Barack Obama rightly stresses that we first must understand how today’s problems emerged. It is “only by understanding how we arrived at this moment that we’ll be able to lift ourselves out of this predicament.”

Unfortunately, Obama (along with most of the Washington establishment) has created only misunderstanding. In calling for a massive increase in government control over the economy, he has evaded the mountain of evidence implicating the government.

We may decide to use this in our booklets to distribute at the upcoming Tax Day Tea Parties in Cleveland and Canton, Ohio.

, , ,

No Comments

Tax Day Tea Parties

Tax Day Tea Party

The Ohio Objectivist Society (OOS) will have a substantial presence at the upcoming Tax Day Tea Parties in both Cleveland and Canton on April 15. As supplies last, we will distribute copies of Atlas Shrugged and other reading material to individuals who show a genuine interest in Rand’s philosophy and the moral foundations of capitalism.

For those interested in attending, here is the information:

Tax Day Tea Parties, Weds April 15

  • Canton: 110 Central Plaza S, 12:00-1:00 [Facebook]
  • Cleveland: Mall C (550 Lakeside Ave), 4:00-6:00 [Facebook]

Also make sure to join our new Facebook group to keep informed about upcoming OOS meetups, book review sessions, and other events!

Cleveland event flyer:

, , , , , , ,

No Comments