Posts Tagged ayn rand

Objectivist Roundup #114

Welcome to the August 27, 2009 edition of the Objectivist Roundup. Writers of the following pieces are motivated by Ayn Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism. According to Ayn Rand:  “My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.”

Joseph Kellard presents ‘He was absolutely a leader’ posted at Joseph Kellard, saying, “An obituary I wrote about an innovative FDNY firefighter. The obit was printed in the Long Beach Herald.”

Roderick Fitts presents Concepts from an Objectivist Perspective, Part 1 posted at Inductive Quest, saying, “The first part of my post explaining my understanding of concepts as an Objectivist. I discuss what concepts are, generally understood, and the differences between concepts and perceptions; this lays the groundwork for my upcoming summary of Rand’s Theory of Concepts in Part 2.”

Stephen Bourque presents Cash for Clunkers posted at One Reality, saying, “For every $4500 that Cash for Clunkers puts into someone’s pocket, it takes more than $4500 away from the Americans to whom that money belongs. The program is not a “stimulation” of anything; it is a carefully disguised welfare package.”

Roderick Fitts presents Concepts from an Objectivist Perspective, Part 2 posted at Inductive Quest, saying, “A summary of key elements of Rand’s theory of concepts, the unit perspective and measurement-omission. Also discusses the nature of abstraction in relation to measurement.”

Diana Hsieh presents Delegation Galore posted at NoodleFood, saying, “Often, maximizing one’s productive potential means delegating work to others, but delegation is a skill that must be learned. This post has some advice on how to delegate effectively.”

Rational Jenn presents PD Tool: Curiosity Questions posted at Rational Jenn, saying, “Using open-ended questions in discipline and problem-solving situations (among others) encourages kids to use independent thinking.”

Kelly Elmore presents I Summon Dr. Johnson, As He Summoned Democritus posted at Reepicheep’s Coracle, saying, “My thoughts on a Samuel Johnson poem that has some relevance to the corruption in our modern world.”

Trey Givens presents Hoplophobia and Anthropophobia posted at Trey Givens.com, saying, “I was a little surprised at the number of people who have been commenting recently in anger and fear that anyone other than the military or police might publicly carry a gun especially in the general vicinity of the president. So, I comment briefly that I think this fear of guns has the tint of a general fear of people. What are your thoughts?”

Kirk presents Thomas Sowell’s “The Housing Boom and Bust,” A review posted at A is A.

Paul Hsieh presents Health Care Debate Shifting onto Moral Grounds posted at NoodleFood, saying, “President Obama now claims that universal health care is a ‘moral obligation’. This is good news for us.”

Stella presents See? We’re not crazy. posted at ReasonPharm, saying, “A brief example of a healthcare protester whom liberals can’t call ‘crazy’.”

Amy Mossoff presents Children Vows posted at The Little Things, saying, “My husband and I thought very carefully before we decided to have a child. We wanted to be very concrete and specific about our reasons and our goals in taking this biggest of all leaps into the unknown. So we decided to write what we call our Children Vows.”

Amy Mossoff presents Announcing the Virtual Objectivist Club posted at The Little Things, saying, “Announcing a great new opportunity for students interested in the ideas of Ayn Rand: the Virtual Objectivist Club.”

Ari Armstrong presents Rationing I: Price Distribution Is Not Rationing posted at FreeColorado.com, saying, “What is the meaning of rationing? First of a four-part series.”

Stella presents Another lesson on making deals with the devil posted at ReasonPharm, saying, “It’s inevitable that Big Pharma will pay for its mistake of championing the increase in Medicare prescription benefits of the Bush administration. If Henry Waxman has his way, the industry will be paying sooner rather than later.”

Dan Edge presents EC Playhouse: A Musical Romp in Sunny-Sided Theater posted at The Edge of Reason, saying, “From the introduction: “This past Friday I had the pleasure of attending Electric City (EC) Playhouse’s musical production of Keep on the Sunny Side. I was so enamored with the story, the songs, and the cast that today I am taking on the role of amateur theater critic. Keep on the Sunny Side is a touching, knee-slapping, benevolent, and delightfully executed biographical musical. The history of The Carter Family is an inspiring tale in its own right, but coupled with timeless folk classics performed by a talented ensemble cast, Sunny Side yields the perfect recipe for an enriching theatrical experience.”"

Doug Reich presents Waiting Under Socialized Medicine posted at The Rational Capitalist, saying, “While British women deliver babies in elevators and toilets, the pragmatist health care bureaucrats wait for more ‘details’ to better understand what is happening. If they could think in principle, no one would have to wait.”

Doug Reich presents Who Are The Real “Masters of Deception”? posted at The Rational Capitalist, saying, “Round up of links related to previous posts analyzing and debunking leftist smear tactics directed at opponents of liberal policies.”

Doug Reich presents Jours Heureux! - Follow Up posted at The Rational Capitalist, saying, “Follow up to a post wherein I discussed the intriguing affair between Thomas Jefferson and Maria Cosway.”

Brian Phillips presents Altruism and the Health Care Police posted at Houston Property Rights, saying, “If concern for the welfare of others is a moral duty, then we must do more than simply pay for the health care of the needy. We must also take steps to improve their overall health.”

Michael Labeit presents A Critique of “Religious Roots of Liberty” by Reverend Edmund A. Opitz posted at Coroner’s Bureau, saying, “Another libertarian argument gone awry.”

That concludes this edition. Submit your blog article to the next edition of the Objectivist Roundup using our carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.

, , ,

4 Comments

Objectivist Roundup #106

Welcome to the July 23, 2009 edition of the Objectivist Roundup, jam packed with 26 articles! Writers of the following pieces are motivated by Ayn Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism. According to Ayn Rand: “My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.”

Khartoum presents Loving Life: The Morality of Self-interest and the Facts that Support It posted at Philosophy, Law and Life., saying, “A review and some of my notes on Craig Biddle’s Loving Life: The Morality of Self-Interest and the Facts that Support it

Becky Daley presents Collectivism and the soda tax posted at The Lucidicus Project, saying, “Congress is considering instituting a soda tax to help pay for government health programs. Improper means to improper ends!”

David Crawford presents How Obama Killed the Iran Election Protests posted at The Undercurrent, saying, “Obama’s timid response to the Iranian election protests lends legitimacy to a very dangerous regime.”

Rituparna Basu presents The Cost of Being Too Good posted at The Undercurrent, saying, “What kind of message does the European Union send to companies when they impose fines on Intel for offering products more cheaply than the competition?”

Roberto Sarrionandia presents Altruism, Collectivism and the British National Party posted at Ayn Rand Forum, saying, “The failure of the mainstream to counter nationalism in British politics.”

Michael Gold presents Want Excellence in Education? Return to Reason posted at MGTutoring.com.

Michael Gold presents Rational Standards of Health posted at EGO.

Stephen Bourque presents Caritas in Veritate: A Manifesto for the Right and Left posted at One Reality, saying, “It becomes more clear as time goes on that the alleged opposites of the secular left and the religious right are not opposites at all… and more importantly are not the only choices.”

Amy Mossoff presents The Right Way to Begin posted at The Little Things, saying, “A chapter in my continuing journey towards homeschooling, including thoughts on phonics programs, Classical Education, and teaching Latin at the elementary school age.”

Paul Hsieh presents Feyman’s Nobel Banquet Speech posted at NoodleFood, saying, “Physicist Richard Feynman explains the real reward he received from his work.”

Trey Givens presents Laws of War posted at Trey Givens, saying, “It would seem that Obama fails to comprehend the nature of war at least as completely as his predecessor. If Bush was an idiot, what do we call the person who watches the idiot and then does the same thing?”

Stella presents In search of a fairy tale posted at ReasonPharm, saying, “I used to be a twice-a-month blogger, but our recent rush toward the pit of socialized medicine compels me to speak out more often. Here’s my latest.”

Stella presents Let’s not get distracted by anything important posted at ReasonPharm, saying, “A second submission this week. Don’t let Obama sweep important issues under the rug by pretending that they’re trivial!”

Khartoum presents Books On Islam In India. posted at Philosophy, Law and Life., saying, “This post talks of some of my experiences with Muslims and their objections to the fact that Islam is not a religion of peace. Also, a few book recommendations on Jihad and India.”

Ari Armstrong presents DeMint’s Health Handouts Violate Liberty posted at FreeColorado.com, saying, “Senator DeMint has some good ideas for reforming health care, such as expanding Health Savings Accounts and limiting frivolous law suits. But one core part of his plan violates liberty by redistributing wealth.”

Grant Jones presents The Bigoted, Post Racial President Wants to Destroy Medical Profession posted at The Dougout.

Roderick Fitts presents Bacon’s “More Certain and Guarded Method” of Induction posted at Inductive Quest, saying, “Roderick Fitts presents “Bacon’s ‘More Certain and Guarded Method’ of Induction,” which summarizes the features of Bacon’s method of induction.”

Sarah presents Architect John Lautner posted at Art, Love, & Philosophy, saying, “John Lautner built some of the most beautiful and iconic houses of the 20th century. Extensive interview with Lautner now available to read online.”

Jared Rhoads presents Choose the field YOU want posted at The Lucidicus Project, saying, “Med students should choose the field or specialty that THEY want, not what Obama thinks we need in order to “serve the needy.”"

Myrhaf presents Obama’s Falling Popularity posted at The New Clarion.

Michael Labeit presents On the Inescapable Contradiction of Fractional Reserve Banking posted at Coroner’s Bureau.

Michael Labeit presents On the Problem of Arguing from the Constitution posted at Coroner’s Bureau, saying, “Why harmony with the Constitution is not the be all and end all of political economy.”

Doug Reich presents How to Stop Socialized Medicine Without Doing Anything posted at The Rational Capitalist, saying, “Doctors could stop the drive towards socialized medicine by doing nothing.”

Doug Reich presents Obama: Please Try This at Home posted at The Rational Capitalist, saying, “Here are some simple experiments to prove why “stimulus” can not work.”

Diana Hsieh presents Values of Harry Potter, Again posted at NoodleFood, saying, “Now that the new Harry Potter movie has been released, I repeat my recommendation of Ari Armstrong’s delightful little book Values of Harry Potter.”

C. August presents Case Study: The Failure of a Conservative’s Defense of Rights posted at Titanic Deck Chairs, saying, “Here is an exchange on the conservative blog of ‘The American Thinker’ about the nature and proper defense of individual rights.”

That concludes this edition. Submit your blog article to the next edition of the Objectivist Roundup using our carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.

, ,

4 Comments

Objectivist Roundup #101

Welcome to the June 18, 2009 edition of the Objectivist Roundup. Writers of the following pieces are motivated by Ayn Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism. According to Ayn Rand:

My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.

“About the Author,” Atlas Shrugged, Appendix.

And so begins Objectivist Roundup #101:

John Drake presents Business ethics research - a good sign posted at Try Reason!, saying, “An update on my research shows a positive sign for spreading Objectivist ethics to business students.”

Jared Rhoads presents LTE on Karl Rove’s reasons posted at The Lucidicus Project, saying, “Karl Rove gives five reasons to oppose socialized medicine, but preserving doctors’ rights is not one of them.”

Lache presents Once common specimen is now an endangered species… posted at Thoughts of a Feral Capitalist.

Kathryn presents Praise for the film “The Brothers Bloom” posted at The Pursuit, saying, “Daniel, the newest blogger at The Pursuit, gives a glowing review of the film The Brothers Bloom (in theaters now)”

Tom Stelene presents Anti-Gunners Still Misfiring posted at The Audacity of Independence, saying, “Whatever dangerous, fraud-based legislation the anti-gun crowd is concocting now can be easily defeated if the American public gets wise to the inherently deceptive nature of the anti-gunners - which is not hard to uncover.”

Khartoum presents Angels and Demons II posted at Philosophy, Law and Life., saying, “This post analyzes the question posed in the movie Angles and Demons over and over again: Could one ever bridge science with religion?”

C. August presents The Aristocracy of Unproductive Zombies posted at Titanic Deck Chairs.

Kelly Elmore presents Parenting Without Altruism posted at Reepicheep’s Coracle.

Ari Armstrong presents Liberty in Religion and Medicine posted at FreeColorado.com, saying, “Do doctors have the right NOT to perform an abortion?”

Daniel presents Do Your Thing. And Do It Now. posted at The Nearby Pen.

Kirk presents Socrates and the State posted at A is A, saying, “A review of Crito by Plato. In one of the many Diaolgues of Socrates Crito pleads with Socrates to not allow his execution to happen, to flee. Socrates - using logic - explicates his reasoning. Unfortunately, there are many flaws in the reasoning of Socrates.”

Edward Cline presents ABC News aka OBC News posted at The Rule of Reason, saying, “To guarantee that there is no ‘debate’ on the government’s plan to impose mandatory health care ‘reform’ on the nation, President Barack Obama has made a deal with ABC News to conduct a phony prime time ‘town hall’ style meeting from the Blue Room of the White House on June 24. The sanctimonious and overly chummy anchor Charles Gibson will host ‘World News’ from that precious vantage point. He will welcome the nation to the to the first airing of the Obama Broadcasting Corporation.”

Paul Hsieh presents Another Doctor “Goes Galt” posted at We Stand FIRM, saying, “We’ll see more doctors doing this if/when we get ‘universal health care’.”

That concludes this edition. Submit your blog article to the next edition of objectivist round up using our carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.

, , ,

3 Comments

Interview with Dr. John Lewis

Dr. John Lewis, who gave the stirring speech at the Charlotte Tea Party on April 15th (video; text) granted us an interview to discuss the impact of his speech, his new book, the future of the country, and other topics. Read on for some great responses.

  • How positive was the response to your Charlotte Tea Party speech? Has it opened any unexpected doors for you?

The response was overwhelmingly positive. The big question of such an event is whether it will be dominated by anarchists (who see no need for a government to protect individual rights), or the religious right (who base their claims on divine visions). I saw little of either. People were there because they are outraged about the crisis in government today–a government that is unwilling to control spending, and that sees no limits to its power to coerce Americans. They were as outraged about government grants to millionaires as they were about welfare programs for the poor.

The door that has opened is to offer intellectual guidance for those who are outraged. Outrage is an emotion. If not based on an intellectual understanding of the issues, it will either dissipate into powerlessness, or mutate into fringe political groups that are as dangerous to American freedom as are the two political parties today. Most of all, this is an opportunity for those Republicans who want limited government to take their party back from the conservatives, who want to impose their own moral views by force onto the rest of us.

  • Do you fear some in the audience latched on to your use of the word “moral”, assumed you meant Christianity, and ignored the rest of your explanation of rational self-interest?

Well, they will have to twist their understand of individual rights–which are inalienable to us by nature–into the gift of a deity or his representatives. I hope that I presented a view of “moral” that is something other than such a gift. The New Testament calls for socialism–see Acts 4.31 through 5.11–and bases it on fear. One Ananias died after failing to hand over all of his wealth to the Apostles–and his wife then died for covering for him. It’s high time for Christians to admit that “give unto the poor” (Jesus) and “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” (Marx) mean the same thing, once enacted politically or inculcated morally.

But my speech was short–it cannot substitute for a broader philosophical understanding of ourselves, the world around us, and the nation we live in. Those who understand the nature of rights, should realize that a supernatural, faith-based understanding of rights concedes to the socialists their claim to be scientific and rational. This concession has prevented conservatives from defending capitalism for the past three generations. If not challenged, it will destroy freedom. But many conservatives, unwilling to grasp the nature of capitalism, freedom and rights, have become supporters of the welfare state. It is time to end this destructive alliance between the socialist left and the religious right.

I might suggest you see my article, “Reason or Faith: The Republican Alternative,” in The Objective Standard.

  • What advice can you give to other Objectivists wanting to make such a rousing speech?

Know your case, and know your principles. There is no shortcut to a good education as the prerequisite to defending reason, rights and freedom.

  • Can you provide some info about your new book, Nothing Less Than Victory? - what is it about, what motivated you to write it, when is it expected to be available, etc?

Nothing Less Than Victory: The Will to Fight and the Lessons of History is in production with Princeton University Press. The book maintains that wars begin because men choose to fight. Only ideas–specifically moral ideas–can lead men into years of slaughter on a continental scale. Major wars do not rage due to chance, technology, or even charismatic leadership–it is ideas that allow men to follow their leaders into carnage for aggressive purposes. For aggressors, the idea of sacrificing oneself for the aggrandizement of the state or the nation–through loot, enslavement of neighbors, or territorial expansion–fuels such a massive efforts at destruction. Many defenders may share those views, and in some wars neither side is right. But in wars in which the side being attacked is out to defend the lives of its citizens, an understanding of their moral goodness is necessary for an effective defense. This is what America had in 1941, when Japan attacked and Germany declared war.

Nothing Less Than Victory examines six wars, from the Greeks and the Romans into the American Civil War and World War Two–in which one side attacked, and the war bogged down into years of bloodshed, until the side under attack mounted a vigorous offense, and destroyed the will to fight in the other. The result, in these cases, was long-term peace, based on a new relationship between former enemies. My book asks us to reconsider the basis for wars in ideas, and to ask what was needed to confront, and end, the will to war in these cases.

[For related discussion in advance of Dr. Lewis's book, I recommend Dr. Yaron Brook's excellent lecture Democracy vs. Victory: Why the "Forward Strategy of Freedom" Had to Fail. --Brian]

  • You have written numerous articles about socialism, American Conservatism, and Islam. Which do you think is currently the greatest threat to our individual rights, and to the country?

The greatest threat is our own failure to understand the nature of our rights, and to recognize the moral goodness of a nation founded to protect those rights. Without this understanding, any one of the movements you mentioned could undercut and destroy the American Republic, and leave its citizens living under a dictatorship. Socialism is destroying America–but this has been abetted by “compassionate conservatism.” And, neither Republicans nor Democrats have been willing to confront and end the threat of totalitarian Islam.

It is clear today that the threats we face are not primarily military attack. It is the subversion of the American system of government that is the greatest threat–and this can only happen by the passive acquiescence of the majority of Americans, who would rise up and demand an end to these threats, if they understood them. This is the historic opportunity we have today–to ground our rights, and our government, on a proper moral basis. If we do that, and act openly in our own rational self-interest, we will save ourselves, our nation, and, incidentally, the world.


John David Lewis is a Visiting Professor of Political Science at Duke University. He has been a Senior Research Scholar in History and Classics at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, and an Anthem Fellow. He contributes to Capitalism Magazine, and is a Consulting Editor for The Objective Standard.

, , , , , , , , ,

3 Comments

The Charlotte Tea Party Speech

The following is reprinted with permission from Capitalism Magazine. Dr. Lewis has set the bar high for those intending to provide a moral defense of capitalism at public events. Also check out the video of his speech.

The Charlotte Tea Party Speech by Dr. John David Lewis, Dept. of Political Science, Duke University was first first delivered on April 15, 2009, Charlotte, North Carolina. This is a slightly revised version by Dr. Lewis for printed publication. Permission is given to read this in full, wherever defenders of liberty may gather.

It is high time for a tea party in America!

But to do this right, we need to understand what it means. So I want to think back for a moment to what happened over 200 years ago, at the time of the original Boston Tea Party.

The Founders of this nation brought forth a radical idea. It was truly radical, practiced nowhere before this time.

This idea was the Rights of Man. The Founders saw each of us as endowed with certain inalienable rights, rights that may not be separated from our nature as autonomous beings.

These inalienable rights are:

  • The Right to Life–the right to live your own life, to choose your own goals, and to preserve your own independent existence.
  • The Right to Liberty, which is the right to act to achieve your goals, without coercion by other men.
  • The Right to the Pursuit of Happiness, to act to achieve your own success, your own prosperity, and your own happiness, for your own sake.
  • And the Right to Property—the right to gain, keep, and enjoy, the material products of your efforts.

Unless I’m mistaken I don’t see anything here about a right to happiness. I see a right to the pursuit of happiness: the right to take the actions needed to attain one’s own happiness. Nor do I see any rights to things at all—no rights to food, clothing, healthcare or diapers. There is only a right to act to achieve those things. This is called freedom.

These rights to act—the rights to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit of happiness—are founded on a certain view of man. Each of us is an individual, autonomous, moral being, with the right to choose his own values and capable of directing his own life.

Look at the person next to you, and look in the mirror—do you see the individual sovereign human being, existing for his own sake, with the right to live, to love, and to act?

This idea—the Founders’ idea of the individual Rights of Man—led to a radical view of government. Government was not to be inherited by the force of an entrenched aristocracy as in Europe, imposed by the divine right of kings through generations of oppression, or enforced by the force of a club.

Government in America was to be designed and instituted by thinking men, for a single purpose: to protect and defend the Rights of Man.

This is what the American Declaration of Independence says: “To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men.” Thinking men, armed with the idea of rights, created a government limited to the protection of individual rights.

For centuries in Europe, the relationship between the people and the government had been that of serf to master: everyone was a servant of the ruling elite. In America, this was turned upside down: government became the servant of the individual. The very reason for a government–and its purpose–is to secure our inalienable, individual rights.

The results in America speak for themselves: the greatest most prosperous nation the world has ever seen. I here quote the writer Ayn Rand (and if you want to understand what is happening today, read her novel Atlas Shrugged). Ayn Rand, speaking to the graduating class at West Point, said that the United States was the first and only moral nation in the history of man, the first nation founded on a moral principle, the Rights of Man, and with a moral purpose, to secure these rights for all men.

This principle of rights is so strong that over years the Americans were able to correct the original shortcomings that the Founders’ could not overcome. Slavery and the denial of women’s suffrage both fell when the principle of rights was properly applied to all men. To correct the original errors did not require the Americans to overthrow the principle, but rather to strengthen and to deepen it, to apply it to everyone, and to renew their commitment to it.

And that is what we must do today.

Because something very bad has happened in America over the last century. A cancer has implanted itself in the land of the free. A cancer has grown in our government and in our society. The cancer is the idea that government is no longer to be the defender of our rights, but rather the grantor of wishes.

Over the past century the idea took hold that government’s purpose was not to secure our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but rather to satisfy our needs, whims and wants. That idea has been implanted in our schools, our media, and our government.

Do you wish for a better house? There’s a government housing agency to give it to you, with taxes extorted from those who buy their own house. Do you wish for health care? There is a government agency who will extort it from others and give it to you. Do you need food? There is a welfare agency to grab the wealth needed to give you food stamps.

And who will provide these handouts? The government, many people say, the all-powerful being that looms over us and grants our wishes. But who is to provide the goods that government hands out? Every person who works and produces, and whose property, gained by the sweat of his efforts, is taken from him by force.

The government has, once again, become a ruling aristocracy, set up as our masters, disposing of our lives.

This cancer has now grown to the point where this ruling elite controls a budget of over four thousand billion dollars a year—more money than can be conceived by the human mind. The government had to grow this big—and it will continue to grow until it destroys this nation—because it is acting according to the idea that it is morally right to take the wealth from those who produce it, and to give it to those who want it.

At the root of this idea is a view of man that is totally at odds with the vision of the Founders: the modern vision of man as a whining dependent, who begs for the needs of life from an all-powerful governing aristocracy. This ruling elite claims the moral right to distribute the wealth of those who earn it to those who wish for it.

If we are going to challenge this monstrosity, if we are going to expunge this cancer, then this is what we must reject. We need to regain the vision of ourselves held by the American Founders. We need to stand up, and assert ourselves as autonomous moral beings, with the right to our own life, liberty and the pursuit of our own happiness. We need to reject the claim that we are weak and dependent beggars, and to assert our own competence to run our own lives.

It is going to take as great a commitment to destroy this cancer as it took to build it. We’re going to have to be strong, we’re going to have to be independent in our thinking, and we are going to have to reject handouts when they are offered to us. And we’re going to have to speak out.

At its heart, the economic and political crisis is a deeper problem—a moral problem. The cause of the crisis today is the worship of need, and the view of man as too stupid to act for his own sake, and worthy of being milked of all his values, to provide for others. This is what we must reject.

Do you think that this is a conspiracy to seize your wealth? It is far worse than that. As Ayn Rand wrote, “It is not your wealth that they’re after. Theirs is a conspiracy against the mind, which means: against life and man.”

This is an attempt to seize your life, to destroy your sense of self as an independent human being, and to replace it with a being with no self-esteem and no capacity for individual action—a being doomed to beg for sustenance from an all-powerful ruling elite.

This ruling elite, looking down on us right now, cannot understand gatherings such as these, in which free people gather to defend liberty. They think that this must be orchestrated by a vast conspiracy, because they cannot understand how autonomous human beings might gather by their own choice, to affirm their commitment to liberty.

Our so-called leaders think this because they don’t see autonomous moral beings at all. They see only serfs, sniveling and whining, begging their masters for the scraps needed to survive, acting as a collective mob rather than as thinking individuals.

Look at yourselves again. Do you see in your face, and in the face of the person next to you, the slave of a group, with no moral status, no rights and no liberties, who is bound from birth to serve? Or do you see an autonomous being with the right to live for his own sake?

Will you knuckle under and become a helpless dependent? Or will you stand tall, and defend your right to your own life, your own liberty, your pursuit of your own individual happiness, and your own property?

It is time to stand up, to say no to the creed of dependence, to assert ourselves, to assert our own moral status, to defend our right to our own lives and property, and to make our voices heard.

Thank you very much.

John David Lewis

Dr. Lewis would like to give his thanks to Char Cushman for the transcription, Andy Clarkson for the original video, and to Matthew Ridenhour for arranging the Charlotte Tea Party.

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Tea Party Summary

[Welcome HBLers! Thanks to Anu Seppala at ARI for the submission.]

We at the Ohio Objectivist Society had a great time attending both the Canton and Cleveland tea parties. There were at least a thousand at the first, and at least twice that at the second. We brought about 60 copies of our booklet of reprinted essays, The Portable Objectivist, and 30 copies of Atlas Shrugged to hand out to interested individuals. I also made a few signs: “Ayn Rand Was Right” — “Atlas Will Shrug”; “Who is John Galt” — “Read Atlas Shrugged”; “Free the Market” — “$” [big green dollar sign].

First up was the Canton Tea Party. It had been raining all morning, but finally stopped when we arrived in Canton. It was still cold, and threatened rain all day. As soon as we got there, Matt, our executive director, started mingling in the crowd - he has a real knack for that. The rest of us walked around the perimeter, and it wasn’t long before we got a request from a local radio station - Ron Ponder’s show on WHBC 1480 AM - for a live interview. We rushed to get Matt, and he was live on the radio within minutes. He covered who we are, why we were there, what we stood for, how we were different from the rest, etc. Here is a photo of us holding up signs during the interview:

Matt went on mingling in the crowd, while we found a strategic high-traffic location, waiting for people to come to us. And they did! At least one in five people were drawn to the “Atlas Will Shrug”/”Ayn Rand Was Right” sign, and told us their stories about when they first read the book. Many were reading it now or had just finished it, but there were a few who read it over 40 or 50 years ago, and an even smaller minority who had read it several times, as well as the rest of Rand’s work. Several others took photos of our signs, or pointed and smiled.

The response to our signs was quite remarkable, and there were even multiple people who said, “nobody is going to get the reference.”

After the Canton event, we grabbed a bite to eat - steaks all ’round at the Longhorn Steakhouse, and mine was bacon-wrapped! We got to Cleveland early and took shelter at a local bar to talk about the Canton event and what to do differently for the Cleveland one. We decided that seeking people out was a better strategy, particularly because the crowd was expected to be larger.

At the Cleveland event, there were several other people with signs referencing Rand - several “Who is John Galt?”, some “Atlas Will Shrug”, and shirts with “John Galt 2012″ and “I am John Galt”. We made several laps around the crowd, and sought out such people to give them business cards and booklets, and let them know about our future meetups and other events. It was a real surprise to meet a self-professed Objectivist couple at the event; hopefully we’ll see them at a future meetup.

My favorite moment at the event was when a guy, who had brought his young son, said that he met his wife over Atlas Shrugged - they were both reading it at the same time. It was his favorite book, and he hoped his son could read it when he gets older. Thad immediately pulled out a copy from his bag, and the kid’s eyes lit up. We tried to limit our distribution to people who said they had heard about the book and wanted to read it. Everyone who got a copy was excited and couldn’t wait to read it.

In all, we handed out over 20 copies of Atlas Shrugged, over 40 copies of our booklet, and dozens of business cards. We got on a couple radio shows, one local TV news segment, and were interviewed by a small local newspaper, all to spread our name. And it’s working - the emails are already pouring in, with people interested in future meetups, book reviews, etc.

For Objectivists interested in attending future protests - such as the Independence Day Tea Party - the one thing we recommend is to bring a nice clear sign that mentions Atlas Shrugged and Ayn Rand. If you build it, they will come.

Courtesy Terri Dewell

Courtesy Terri Dewell

Here is a slideshow of photos taken by the OOS at the events:

, , , , , ,

10 Comments

Atlas Shrugged, Paine, Shlaes at Record Sales on Amazon

After flying up and down the Amazon Bestseller list, Atlas Shrugged is once again advancing toward the top. Over a two-hour period today, it jumped eight spots, from #25 to #17 - an unprecedented move for such a high position. With all the interest in Rand throughout the media in light of the financial crisis, it’s not surprising that book sales are so high.

However, some might say that people are simply impulse buying, based on the recommendations of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and other semi-rational (and semi-irrational) personalities. Such people are never going to read the book, or take its message seriously.

Well, there is some evidence that that is not the case. If you look at the Atlas Shrugged product section titled, “Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought“, you will see Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and Amity Shlaes’s The Forgotten Man listed. As with Atlas Shrugged, these books are also on the Bestseller list - at #24 and #44 respectively. So many people are likely going to the Atlas Shrugged product page and buying it in addition to the other recommended books on that page. This shows more than just a passing interest in the book - people want to know more and actually understand what is going on in the world. Granted, it would be preferable if some of Rand’s non-fiction ranked as high, but it’s a start nonetheless!

If it ever breaks the top 10, it will be interesting to see what happens, because then it would be on the front page of Amazon.

, , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Tax Day Tea Parties

Tax Day Tea Party

The Ohio Objectivist Society (OOS) will have a substantial presence at the upcoming Tax Day Tea Parties in both Cleveland and Canton on April 15. As supplies last, we will distribute copies of Atlas Shrugged and other reading material to individuals who show a genuine interest in Rand’s philosophy and the moral foundations of capitalism.

For those interested in attending, here is the information:

Tax Day Tea Parties, Weds April 15

  • Canton: 110 Central Plaza S, 12:00-1:00 [Facebook]
  • Cleveland: Mall C (550 Lakeside Ave), 4:00-6:00 [Facebook]

Also make sure to join our new Facebook group to keep informed about upcoming OOS meetups, book review sessions, and other events!

Cleveland event flyer:

, , , , , , ,

No Comments